Quantifying emissions and distinguishing between different methane sources
Download a full PDF of Petroleum and the Environment (free) or purchase a printed version ($19.99).
Other parts in this series:
1. Petroleum and the Environment: an Introduction
2. Water in the Oil and Gas Industry
3. Induced Seismicity from Oil and Gas Operations
4. Water Sources for Hydraulic Fracturing
5. Using Produced Water
6. Groundwater Protection in Oil and Gas Production
7. Abandoned Wells
8. What Determines the Location of a Well?
9. Land Use in the Oil and Gas Industry
10. The Pinedale Gas Field, Wyoming
11. Heavy Oil
12. Oil and Gas in the U.S. Arctic
13. Offshore Oil and Gas
14. Spills in Oil and Natural Gas Fields
15. Transportation of Oil, Gas, and Refined Products
16. Oil Refining and Gas Processing
17. Non-Fuel Products of Oil and Gas
18. Air Quality Impacts of Oil and Gas
19. Methane Emissions in the Oil and Gas Industry
20. Mitigating and Regulating Methane Emissions
21. Regulation of Oil and Gas Operations
22. Health and Safety in Oil and Gas Extraction
23. Subsurface Data in the Oil and Gas Industry
24. Geoscientists in Petroleum and the Environment
Glossary of Terms
Methane Facts and Figures
- In 2015, methane made up about 10% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in terms of global warming potential; carbon dioxide (CO2) made up 82%.1
- Natural gas (methane) provided 31.5% of U.S. electricity in 2017 – the largest single source of electricity in the country.2
- Natural gas power generation produces 50-60% less CO2 than coal to produce the same amount of energy,3 but methane leaks reduce this emissions-saving benefit.
- EPA estimates of methane emissions from natural gas systems decreased by 16% from 1990 to 2015. EPA-estimated methane emissions from crude oil and refined oil product systems decreased 28% from 1990 to 2015.4 However, emissions estimates remain uncertain.
- In addition to livestock, manure, mining, and landfills, other major sources of global methane emissions also include wetlands and rice paddies.5
Methane is the main component of natural gas, a cheap, abundant, and versatile source of energy that produces less carbon dioxide than other fossil fuels when burned. However, methane itself is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Methane leaks from wells, pipelines, or processing equipment can substantially increase the greenhouse gas emissions of the natural gas sector, while also wasting resources as methane escapes into the atmosphere.
Identifying Methane Sources
Methane may be produced in two ways. Thermogenic methane, the source of most natural gas reserves, is produced by the effects of heat and pressure on the deeply buried remains of marine microorganisms, and usually occurs with oil. Biogenic methane is produced by microbes in the stomachs of cows, sheep, goats, and other ruminant animals (known as enteric fermentation), and in manure, shallow coal and oil deposits, and wetlands. Identifying whether a methane source is thermogenic or biogenic is crucial for determining the methane emissions from oil and gas operations. This section of Petroleum and the Environment focuses on quantifying emissions of methane into the atmosphere; other parts of this series cover efforts to reduce methane emissions (“Mitigating and Regulating Methane Emissions”), and issues of methane in groundwater (“Groundwater Protection in Oil and Gas Production”).
EPA estimates of U.S. methane emission sources in 2015. Image credit: American Geosciences Institute, modified from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1
U.S. Methane Emissions
Determining the relative methane emissions from different sources is very difficult. The majority of methane emissions come from several vast industries that often operate right next to each other (agriculture, oil and gas, mining, and waste management). Leaks can be short-lived or prolonged, and emission rates from agriculture and landfills change over time. So although atmospheric methane levels can be measured very accurately, there is a great deal of uncertainty in the overall proportion of emissions coming from different human activities. The national numbers in this sheet are best available estimates but may not be fully accurate.
Since the early 1990s, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has annually released the U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory4 as part of U.S. reporting to the United Nations in accordance with the Framework Convention on Climate Change.6 The inventory is based on emissions reports from more than 8,000 industrial, manufacturing, and oil and gas facilities; power plants; and landfills.7 These reports represent only about half of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in large uncertainties in emissions volumes.
Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Systems
The oil and natural gas system is one of the most complex sources for emissions estimates because of the number of emission sources, their technical complexity, and the variability between different facilities.8,9 Similar facilities may report different emissions,8 and emission volumes may change over time as new leaks arise and are detected and repaired.10
Reflecting this complexity, the EPA estimate of the overall methane leak rate from the U.S. natural gas system has changed over time as new information has become available.11 For example, between 2010 and 2011, the EPA’s leak estimate for the year 2008 was updated from 96 to 212 million metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent; in 2013 this was then revised down to 163 million metric tons.13 Estimates have not varied as widely from 2014 to 2017, but there remains considerable uncertainty in these figures.
Improvements in remote sensing technologies are allowing increasingly high-precision measurements of regional methane emissions from plane-mounted sensors and even satellites. MethaneSAT (artist’s impression pictured), a partnership led by the Environmental Defense Fund and launching in 2020 or 2021, will measure methane emissions from fifty major oil- and gas-producing regions around the world. Image credit: Environmental Defense Fund.12
Regional Emissions Studies
Detailed studies of major oil- and gas-producing areas can identify biogenic vs. thermogenic methane sources, monitor smaller sources not included in the EPA inventory, and identify particularly leaky equipment. Location-specific studies have been a major research focus in recent years.14 For example:
- A study of seven oil- and gas-producing regions in the U.S. found higher methane emissions in mainly oil-producing areas than in mainly gas-producing areas. This in part reflects the fact that oil may contain some methane that can escape from oil storage tank vents and other openings.15
- In the Barnett shale area around Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas, 67% of methane emissions are from oil and gas sources.16 Half of all oil and gas methane emissions in this area come from just 2% of production, processing, and transportation facilities, and 90% of emissions come from just 10% of facilities.17 This suggests that most of the natural gas infrastructure is reliable, but a small number of “super-emitting” sites have major leaks. Super-emitting sites are expected to change over time as equipment accrues damage and is repaired or replaced. Detecting and reducing emissions therefore requires continuous monitoring.10
The extent of methane leaks from the natural gas system is one of the largest uncertainties regarding the environmental impact of the oil and gas industry. Working towards a comprehensive understanding of methane emissions is a major area of current research, involving a combination of large-scale regional measurements and focused local studies from the ground, air, and space.
1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Overview of Greenhouse Gases.
2 U.S. Energy Information Administration – Electric Power Monthly, Table 1.1 – Net Generation by Energy Source: Total (All Sectors), 2007-December 2017.
3 National Energy Technology Laboratory (2013). Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, Revision 2a, September 2013.
4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2017). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2015.
5 Schmidt, G. (2004). Methane: A Scientific Journey from Obscurity to Super-Stardom. NASA Research Features.
6 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – National Reports.
7 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP).
8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013). Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: 2011 Data Summary.
9 Heath, G. et al. (2015). Estimating U.S. Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Supply Chain: Approaches, Uncertainties, Current Estimates, and Future Studies. Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A50-62820.
10 Zavala-Araiza, D. et al. (2015). Toward a Functional Definition of Methane Super-Emitters: Application to Natural Gas Production Sites. Environ. Sci. Technol., 49(13), 8167-8174.
11 Lattanzio, R.K. (2018). Methane and Other Air Pollution Issues in Natural Gas Systems. Congressional Research Service Report R42986
12 “EDF Announces Satellite Mission to Locate and Measure Methane Emissions.” Environmental Defense Fund Press Release, Apri l 11, 2018.
13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report Archive.
14 Environmental Defense Fund (2017) – Methane Research: The 16 Study Series.
15 Lyon, D. et al. (2016). Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites. Environ. Sci. Technol., 50(9), 4877-4886.
16 Townsend-Small, A. et al. (2015). Integrating Source Apportionment Tracers into a Bottom-up Inventory of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Hydraulic Fracturing Region. Environ. Sci. Technol., 49(13), 8175-8182.
17 Zavala-Araiza, D. et al. (2015). Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112(51), 15597-15602.
Petroleum and the Environment, Part 19/24
Written by E. Allison and B. Mandler for AGI, 2018