Remote Sensing Supports Emergency Management Response to Tornados

PDF versionPDF version

Remote sensing imagery is used by researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison to support recovery efforts after a tornado.

Defining the Problem

Following a tornado, first responders need maps of the width and location (swath) of the damage area. The biggest challenge when integrating remote sensing into disaster response is timeliness. To be most useful, remote sensing imagery maps must reach emergency management personnel within the first 100 hours after an event. These 100 hours are the most critical for response decisions. For example, first responders need to decide what houses, schools, hospitals, and nursing homes to search first for survivors. After this period, most of the important deployment decisions, such as where and how to get fire engines around blocked streets, have been made with or without the benefit of remote sensing imagery. After the response phase, emergency operations enter the recovery phase. This includes clean-up, victim support, and infrastructure repair. Here too, remote sensing imagery and maps are useful.

Selecting the Imagery

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison have developed techniques for using satellite imagery collected by the Landsat TM sensor and the ASTER sensor to measure and map the path of destruction left by tornados. Both sensors supply moderate-resolution imagery suitable for such damage analysis, including both before and after images to enable change detection. The type of imagery selected is determined by which sensor recorded the most recent, relatively cloud-free imagery before the storm, and by how soon after a storm a satellite with one of these sensors passes over a damaged area during relatively cloud-free conditions.

Applying the Imagery

Researchers at the University of Wisconsin– Madison have worked with Wisconsin Emergency Management personnel to integrate satellite remote sensing imagery into the early response system for tornados. This integration has enabled disaster response personnel to use the imagery and resulting maps to support recovery efforts. The first use of remote sensing imagery in response to a tornado in Wisconsin occurred when an F3 tornado touched down in Siren, Wisconsin on June 18, 2001. The Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery acquired before and after the tornado clearly identified the affected area and was used to produce image and cartographic maps of the damage swath (Fig. 1). Landsat-7 captured imagery on May 18, 2001, one month before the storm and on June 19, 2001, the morning after the storm of June 18. The tornado tore across the landscape and left a 25-million dollar swath of destruction more than 40 kilometers long through a heavily forested area. This storm resulted in three deaths, eight serious injuries, complete destruction of 180 homes and businesses, and damage to 270 others. The University of Wisconsin–Madison team processed the Landsat imagery from both dates, calculated the change-detection data visible in the Landsat image map (Fig. 1), and quickly distributed the imagery and information to emergency management staff onsite via the Internet.

Fig. 1 Image map (top) from Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery before and after an F3 tornado hit Siren, Wisconsin, on June 18, 2001. The damage swath is plotted on a cartographic map (bottom) that was used by disaster response personnel

Figure 1: Image map (top) from Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery before and after an F3 tornado hit Siren, Wisconsin, on June 18, 2001. The damage swath is plotted on a cartographic map (bottom) that was used by disaster response personnel

Four years later, this approach was also helpful when another F3 hit Stoughton, Wisconsin, on August 18, 2005. It was one of 28 tornados that ripped through southern Wisconsin that day . Fig. 2 is a Landsat TM image of the Stoughton area about one month before the August 18 tornado. Clouds interfered with the timing for acquiring a post-event Landsat image, but 10 days after the storm the ASTER sensor on the Terra satellite captured an image covering the damage area. Fig. 3 shows a change detection image that combines data from the earlier TM image with information from the post-tornado ASTER image. This change detection image highlighted the swath of the tornado very well. Even though cloud cover prevented researchers from producing damage swath maps within the first 100-hour response time, Wisconsin Emergency Management found the images helpful in recovery operations for weeks after the storm.

Fig. 2 Landsat TM imagery showing the Stoughton, Wisconsin area on July 19, 2005. This image uses blue, green, and red EM radiation bands in a natural color image

Fig. 3 Image shows the ground trace of the tornado. It uses the blue and green spectral bands of a Landsat 5 TM image acquired one month before the storm and the red band of a Terra ASTER image acquired 10 days after the storm.

Figure 2 (top): Landsat TM imagery showing the Stoughton, Wisconsin area on July 19, 2005. This image uses blue, green, and red EM radiation bands in a natural color. Image Credit: Sam Batzli, University of Wisconsin–Madison

Figure 3 (bottom): Image shows the ground trace of the tornado. It uses the blue and green spectral bands of a Landsat 5 TM image acquired one month before the storm and the red band of a Terra ASTER image acquired 10 days after the storm.

Additional Information

Case study author: Sam Batzli (University of Wisconsin–Madison)

Case study from:  Dodge, R.L and Congalton, R.G. 2013. Meeting Environmental Challenges with Remote Sensing Imagery, p. 32‐33. Published by the American Geosciences Institute Environmental Awareness Series. Click here to download the full handbook.

 

Related Geoscience Currents

Fig. 3. U.S. Highway 85 crossing the Little Missouri River. Seventy-five percent of the rocks in this photograph, all of those in the foreground and the rocks along the north valley wall in the background have slid and are out of place. Credit: E. Murphy

Geologic map guides transportation planning in North Dakota

May 19, 2017
Geologic maps can help to show which areas may be more prone to landslides and therefore directly assist in making optimum engineering design choices. Defining the Problem U.S Highway 85 and ND Highway 22, along with numerous county roads, buildings, pipelines, and power lines, have been...
Fig. 1. A 1995 landslide in Overland Park, Kansas, destroyed two homes and damaged four lots. Credit: Kansas Geological Survey

Geologic map delineates landslide hazards in Kansas

May 19, 2017
Landslide hazard maps based on geologic maps are a tool for local government officials, planners, developers, engineers, insurance companies, lending institutions, and landowners to assess the risk and take appropriate actions. Defining the Problem Damaging landslides occur even in vertically...
Fig. 1. Although Glacier Peak normally can not be seen from any urban areas, this active volcano periodically erupts in an explosive catastrophic manner that could affect the lower part of the populated Skagit River Valley. Credit: D. Mullineaux, USGS

Geologic maps identify volcanic hazards in Washington

May 19, 2017
Surface and subsurface mapping of lahar and lahar runout deposits from Glacier Peak volcano has contributed important geologic information for land-management planning and emergency preparedness in the lower Skagit Valley. Defining the Problem Active volcanoes, such as Glacier Peak (Fig. 1), pose...
Fig 1. A NPS ranger leads visitors into the mouth of Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky.

Case study: Geologic maps and cave resources in Kentucky

May 19, 2017
Geologic maps are being used in Kentucky to identify areas that have high potential for development of karst features, such as sinkholes and caves. Defining the Problem A new interstate highway, I-66, is being planned to pass through the vicinity of Mammoth Cave National Park (Fig. 1). It is one...
Fig. 1. Densely built urban areas on soft soils are prone to earthquake damage. Geologic maps provide vital information on the extent of these soils. Credit: N.J. Department of Environmental Protection

Geologic map guides earthquake damage prediction in New Jersey

May 19, 2017
Geologic mapping provides the data foundation that makes soil mapping and earthquake simulations possible. This approach also can be used to predict damage in areas where the historical record indicates a risk of potential earthquakes. Defining the Problem The density and value of its buildings...
Fig. 3. View of part of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline at the Denali Fault showing major design features. Fault movement and intense ground shaking were accommodated by zigzagging the pipeline and leaving it free to slide. Credit: M. Metz, Anchorage

Geologic map aids mitigation of earthquake damage in Alaska

May 19, 2017
On November 3, 2002, the 800-mile long Trans-Alaska Pipeline pipeline was able to withstand the largest recorded earthquake for the Denali fault without spilling a drop of oil and with only 3 days shutdown time for inspections. The survival of the pipeline demonstrates the value of combining...