Back to Abstract Index
Paper Number: 94
Seismicity Induced by Mine
Flooding
Cichowicz, A.
Council for Geoscience , Private Bag X112, Pretoria , South Africa
0001, artur@geoscience.org.za
___________________________________________________________________________
In November 2008, the closure of the East Rand Proprietary Mines
resulted in the closure of the last pumping station in the Central Rand
Basin, South Africa, which previously maintained the underground water
level. The consequent large scale rise in the water level was and still
is responsible for increased levels of seismicity in the area.
Monitoring of seismicity in the Central Rand Basin has been an on-going
process for over five years.
A fundamental question is: how does fluid-induced seismicity in the
Central Rand Basin change over time? The level of seismicity in the
Central Rand Basin is not showing signs of decreasing with time since
the number of strong events with moment (Mw) magnitudes above
2 is still as high as it was when monitoring began over five years
ago.
The spatial and time variation of seismicity in the Central Rand
Basin area was analyzed. Special attention was given to seismic source
parameters such as magnitude, scalar seismic moment, radiated seismic
energy and static stress drop. Static stress drop heavily influences
ground motion characteristics, which, in urban areas, affects the risk
assessment. The observed static stress drop varied from 0.05MPa to
10MPa. The static stress drop increases with an increase in the seismic
moment for seismic moment values ranging from 1010 Nm to
1013 Nm. However, for a seismic moment larger than
1013 Nm, an upper limit for the static stress drop at 10MPa
was found.
Most events are located within historical mine boundaries. The
seismicity pattern shows a strong relationship between the presence of
the mining void and high levels of seismicity. The seismicity did not,
for the most part, appear to migrate to areas outside of the old mining
boundaries.
The temporal evolution of the inter-event time confirms that the
fluid-induced seismicity follows a clustering pattern and is not random.
The temporal evolution of the inter-event time provides an understanding
of the physical mechanisms of earthquake interaction. Changes in the
characteristics of the inter-event time are produced when a stress
change is applied to a group of faults in the region. Results from this
study indicate that the fluid-induced source has a shorter inter-event
time in comparison to a random distribution. This behaviour corresponds
to a clustering of events, in which short recurrence times tend to be
close to each other, forming clusters of events.
A detailed analysis of the cumulative seismic moment revealed that
initially, the eastern part of the area was responsible for the largest
portion of the total seismic deformation but on 18 November 2013 the
biggest event appearing in the catalogue, occurred in the western part.
This implies that the dynamic forces that control seismicity in the area
are fluctuating. The evolution of the seismicity pattern over time
indicates that the Central Rand Basin is still in a very unstable state.
Over the last five years, the total cumulative seismic moment released
in the Central Rand Basin was 9.0x1014 Nm. This is equivalent
to a single earthquake of magnitude Mw 3.9, which is
significantly less than the largest earthquake experienced during mining
times. In 1972 a magnitude Mw 4.8 earthquake was observed in
the East Rand Proprietary Mines.