How did you transition into the geoscience workforce? A new blog post from AGI Workforce Program intern, Jamie Ricci, on her experience and how geoscience graduate students, alumna and faculty can help.
In the American Geosciences Institute’s newest Status of the Geoscience Workforce Report, released May 2014, jobs requiring training in the geosciences continue to be lucrative and in-demand. Even with increased enrollment and graduation from geoscience programs, the data still project a shortage of around 135,000 geoscientists by the end of the decade.
The Status of the Geoscience Workforce 2018 report is based on original data collected by AGI as well as from federal data sources, professional membership organizations, and industry. The report integrates all of these various data sources into a comprehensive view of the human and economic parameters of the geosciences, including supply and training of new students, workforce demographics and employment projections, to trends in geosciences research funding and economic indicators.
Witnesses: Charles Holliday
Chair, Committee on Research Universities, National Research Council John Mason
Associate Provost and Vice President for Research, Auburn University Jeffrey Seemann
Vice President for Research, Texas A&M University
Chief Research Officer, The Texas A&M University System
Witnesses: William Green
Executive Chairman, Accenture Ray Johnson
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Lockheed Martin Corporation John Hickman
Director, Global University Relations and Life Sciences, Deere and Company Lou Graziano
Witnesses: Norm Augustine
Retired Chairman and CEO, Lockheed Martin Corporation Carl Wieman
Director of the Science Education Initiative, University of Colorado Boulder Jeffrey Furman
Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research Peter Lee
Answering a community-wide call from geoscience societies and employers, an American Geoscience Institute inter-society ad hoc committee examined the issue of academic geosciences program accreditation. The committee has concluded its two years of study, and released a report that details three observations regarding the classification of college and university geoscience programs.